What’s the Scoop? What You Need to Know about the 2018 Virginia and Pennsylvania Legislative Sessions Featured
- Wednesday, 09 May 2018 18:24
- Written by Katlyn Clark
The Waterkeepers and Riverkeepers in our coalition are vigilantly working to make the waters of the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays swimmable and fishable. Together, the Waterkeepers Chesapeake network patrols thousands of miles of tributaries and shorelines throughout the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays, and are at the forefront of water quality related enforcement and advocacy efforts in Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania. Earlier this month we shared our legislative victories in Maryland. Here’s what you need to know about the 2018 Virginia and Pennsylvania (so far) legislative sessions.
In Virginia, from January to March this year the James Riverkeeper and others worked hard to protect oyster sanctuaries across the state. Fortunately, they were successful in defeating a bill which would have placed these invaluable sanctuaries at risk (for the second year in a row!). Next week, Virginia will be considering its state budget - with a proposal from Governor McAuliffe that supports the Virginia Land Conservation Foundation, Virginia Outdoors Foundation and Environmental Education. There are also multiple proposals from the Senate, like $20 million for the Stormwater Local Assistance Fund and funding for oyster restoration and replenishment, that we are supportive of. Find out more about the Virginia’s budget proposals here.
Potomac Riverkeeper joined James Riverkeeper to address the threats associated with coal ash in the Virginia legislature. They successfully advocated for the passage of Senate Bill 807, which prevents the Virginia Department from Environmental Quality (DEQ) from issuing any new coal ash solid waste permits at Dominion until July 1, 2019. This will not prevent DEQ from issuing permits from the closure of ponds that coal ash has been moved out of. The bill also requires a report by December 2018 that reviews the amount of recyclable coal ash at each coal ash pond, the costs associated with recycling, and the market demand for recycled ash.
Another bill Waterkeepers Chesapeake was closely watching - Senate Bill 950 - was signed by the Governor at the end of March. This bill requires DEQ to conduct a Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification, or additional reviews and analysis of potential water quality impacts, of any new pipeline (larger than 36 inches in diameter) within one year of receiving an application for construction. This bill will bring Virginia in line with federal court rulings that a state must ‘use or lose’ its Clean Water Act authority to conduct additional reviews on major infrastructure projects within a year of receiving a permit application.
In Pennsylvania, the legislative session will run through the end of June - so there’s still a fighting chance on a few environmental policies! We’ve seen a few victories in the Senate, with the passage of the sunset of the Recycling Fund and a fix to the Sewage Facilities Act. We’ve also seen a few losses, like House Bill 1959, which passed in the House and would create a new third party permit review bureaucracy at Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection. This bill represents yet another attempt to give potentially biased third parties the power to direct DEP to issue permits for projects that cause environmental harm. If you live in Pennsylvania, make sure to contact your state representative and voice your opposition for this bill!
Another bill moving through the Pennsylvania legislature - Senate Bill 792 - has our full support as it would provide comprehensive licensing, registration and labeling for toxic fertilizers in the state. Overwhelmingly passing in the Senate, this bill addresses concerns of growing stormwater pollution from urban and suburban sectors and aims to reduce the environmental impacts from fertilizers that impair the Chesapeake Bay. This is another important bill to contact your house representative on!
As more environmental and water quality bills move through the Pennsylvania legislature, we’ll keep you updated on their status. To stay up to date on all of Waterkeepers Chesapeake work, sign up for emails and action alerts here.
- Tuesday, 01 May 2018 11:04
- Written by Katlyn Clark
With the 2018 Maryland Session coming to a close earlier this month, we’d like to let you know about the important legislative victories we achieved along with some of the policies we may revisit in 2019. Over the past few months, Waterkeepers Chesapeake partnered with Maryland waterkeepers and other environmental organizations in the General Assembly to increase public access to government records, increase public participation at the Public Service Commission (PSC), prevent the use of harmful chemicals, decrease the amount of foam in local waterways, and close loopholes under current law that enable the net loss of forests in Maryland -- to name a few.
Thanks to the work of Fair Farms and others, we were able to secure funding for the Maryland Farms and Families program.The Maryland General Assembly included $200,000 in the final budget for this program that matches purchases made by low-income Marylanders using federal nutrition assistance like SNAP (food stamps) at participating farmers markets. While the Governor still needs to allocate the funds for this program -- you can ask him to do so here -- we are now one step closer to having Maryland fund a successful program that directly supports small farmers, food-insecure Marylanders, and our local economy.
This past session the General Assembly also legalized hemp production in Maryland. Hemp has a number of benefits for our environment, provides a new income stream for farmers, diversifies our state’s agricultural system, and may bring new jobs and opportunities to Maryland. You can find out more about the benefits of this beneficial crop in this educational report from the Abell Foundation.
South Riverkeeper, ShoreRivers, Clean Water Action, and other partners were able to secure the passage of legislation that incentivizes the development of Septic Stewardship Plans in localities. The Plans incorporate best management practices and will allow the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) to more readily identify failing septic systems across the state. This policy is on the way to be signed by the Governor and once it’s implemented, we’ll have less nitrogen in our waterways across the state.
Another legislative win includes the passage of the Complete Streets Program, which provides grants to local jurisdictions to update their roads to include retrofits for bicyclists and green stormwater infrastructure, among other improvements. This program aims to reduce stormwater runoff, promote healthy communities, and improve the safety of Marylanders. A big thank you to Delegate Brooke Lierman for sponsoring this legislation.
This session we also supported the work of Assateague Coastkeeper and others to establish strict liability for any future offshore drilling activities in Maryland. With three proposed lease areas for drilling off the coast in Maryland under a new program from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, this bill acts a stopgap measure to prevent and discourage any drilling from taking place by establishing offshore drilling as an “ultrahazardous and abnormally dangerous activity” - meaning that any company that drills will be held liable for any damage or injury to a person or property due to any activities associated with drilling, regardless of the circumstances. It is our hope that this bill and other efforts will ultimately make offshore drilling in Maryland not viable.
Issues to Revisit in 2019
Improved Public Participation and Notification at the Public Service Commission
A suite of bills we promoted would have modernized the public notification process at the Public Service Commission (PSC) and would have built health considerations into the review process. For instance, House Bill 715 would have required public notice via multiple forms of print and social media, and the opportunity to opt-in to direct text messaging for major projects, like power plants, going through the PSC. While this bill had strong grassroots support and educational messaging, unfortunately this bill did not make it out of the House Economic Matters Committee due to inaction from House Leadership. Over the interim, we plan to ramp up education around these much needed issues and work with Delegate Robynn Lewis, the Maryland Environmental Health Network, and others to garner support from key legislator champions.
Public Access to Records
According to the Maryland Department of Agriculture, Nutrient Management Plans (NMPs) “protect Maryland’s waterways from nutrient pollution... [and] ensure that nutrients [and manure] applied to crops and lawns are not impacting waterways." While the Maryland legislature intended to make NMP summaries and associated cost-share documents available to the public, the high costs and large amount of redactions to this information has virtually rendered it inaccessible. House Bill 1221 sought to address this problem, while still protecting the identity of the NMP holder - simply bringing NMPs in line with other information that’s available through Public Information Act. While this bill ultimately failed in the House Environment and Transportation Committee, we plan to work with Environmental Integrity Project and other partners over the interim to obtain fair access to this information.
More Forests, Cleaner Waterways
Conserving forest acreage is vital for clean water as forests act as one of nature's best water filters and reduce runoff. The Forest Conservation Act would have closed loopholes that enable the net loss of Maryland's priority forests due to development. While this bill was turned into a Task Force bill, and then ultimately died in the Senate, we believe the issue will be ripe for further discussion in 2019.
House Bill 116 and Senate Bill 500 would have prevented the use of chlorpyrifos--a toxic, nerve agent pesticide--in the state of Maryland. Despite having a preponderance of credible science that links chlorpyrifos with brain damage in children and support for the bill from thousands of Marylanders, special interests were able to kill the bill quietly in the Senate. We’ll continue our work in ensuring safe and clean waterways from harmful chemicals and pesticides, like chlorpyrifos, and revisit this issue in 2019.
Less Foam in Local Waterways
House Bill 538 and Senate Bill 651 would have lessened the amount of disposable foam products in our local streams and rivers by reducing the amount of foam used for food services. Foam breaks into tiny pieces that absorb 10 times more pesticides, fertilizers, and chemicals than other kinds of plastic. This increases toxin exposure to our marine life and threatens local waterways and drinking water sources alike. While Senate Bill 651 was voted out of the Senate Education, Health, and Environmental Affairs Committee, it ultimately failed on the Senate Floor.
Community Healthy Air Act
House Bill 26 and Senate Bill 133, otherwise known as the Community Healthy Air Act, would have required a one-time study of air emissions from industrial livestock farms to see if there may be health impacts on neighboring communities.While this bill simply sought science and and basic information to ensure the safety of Marylanders living in areas overburdened with farming operations, the Community Healthy Air Act did not move out of committee. By working on this bill, legislators and their staff were able to learn about this important issue and hear directly from citizens concerned about their health.
These past few months had a few challenges and unexpected surprises, and while we wish all of our priority bills had passed, we are feeling incredibly inspired and hopeful to make progress on our issues moving forward.
- Monday, 30 April 2018 18:11
- Written by Katlyn Clark
In 2015, Waterkeepers Chesapeake joined more than a half-million comments from people supporting the safeguards that U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now seeking to remove in its proposed rule. The 2015 coal ash regulations were imposed after lengthy negotiations with utilities, other industries and environmentalists. Relaxing those common sense, science-based rules now – even as utilities are in the process of reporting the extent of coal-ash contamination and devising plans to address it – would mean the lessons learned from the coal ash accidents in Tennessee and North Carolina are being ignored. The proposed rule (‘remand rule’) would once again put our water and public health at risk – with more than 1.5 million children living near coal ash storage sites and seventy percent of all coal ash impoundments disproportionately impacting low-income communities – this is a risk that the EPA should be unwilling to take.
Coal-fired power plants in the United States burn more than 800 million tons of coal every year, producing more than 110 million tons of solid waste in the form of fly ash, bottom ash, scrubber sludge and boiler slag—commonly known as coal ash. Hazardous chemicals present in coal are concentrated in the ash when coal is burned. Consequently, coal ash contains a toxic brew of carcinogens, neurotoxins, and poisons—including arsenic, boron, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, lead, lithium, mercury, molybdenum, selenium, thallium, and radioactive substances. These toxics raise the risk for cancer, heart disease, and stroke, and can inflict permanent brain damage on children. When this dangerous waste is not disposed of properly, the toxic chemicals are released to air, groundwater, surface water, and soil.
For decades, billions of tons of coal ash have been dumped in unlined pits next to our lakes and rivers. Toxic chemicals from coal ash leak into those waterways and pollute groundwater and drinking water wells. Fugitive dust from coal ash dumps foul the air of nearby residents. And hundreds of aging earthen dams hold back billions of gallons of toxic sludge, threatening the communities that live downstream. This holds true for the Chesapeake Bay region on rivers like the Potomac, James, Patuxent and Susquehanna.
In 2015, the Obama administration adopted the first-ever national standards for the disposal of coal ash. The federal rule requires numerous critical safeguards, including regular inspection of ash ponds, monitoring of groundwater, shutdown of leaking dumps, shutdown of dumps in dangerous locations, cleanup when contamination is found, safe closure, and public posting of monitoring and inspection results. Following President Trump’s inauguration, however, industry groups demanded EPA weaken the rule. EPA agreed and is now proposing the very changes industry so badly wants.
Trump’s proposed remand rule clears the way for polluters, and polluter-funded politicians, to avoid the minimum national standards and employ their own weak standards for groundwater monitoring, coal ash cleanups, and several other core health and environmental protections included in the 2015 rule. As justification for the rollback, EPA points to millions of dollars of cost savings for owners of coal ash dumps. But the facts and science on which the 2015 rule was based have not changed. What has changed is the Trump EPA’s prioritization of polluter interests over the protection of public health.
On April 30, 2018, we filed coments opposing the proposed rollback that included the following:
EPA’s Remand Rule
1. The remand rule weakens groundwater protections and removes protections for children’s health.
EPA is proposing to allow states to set different, less protective, standards for cobalt, lead, molybdenum, and lithium. Additionally, EPA deliberately excluded a requirement that states consider risks to sensitive subgroups—including children—when setting alternative standards. Now, EPA is telling states it is okay to ignore those risks. EPA is also suggesting owners and operators of coal ash dumps write their own standards for those pollutants without direct government oversight.
2. The remand rule makes toxic cleanups discretionary.
EPA is proposing making cleanup of groundwater contamination discretionary—that is, to let polluters do nothing even where contamination above groundwater protection standards is found. More than half the U.S. population, including 99 percent of the rural population, relies on groundwater for its drinking water supply.
3. The remand rule eliminates the requirement that leaking unlined ponds install liners or close.
EPA is proposing to eliminate the requirement that unlined coal ash ponds that leak toxic chemicals above groundwater protection standards install liners or close by a date certain. EPA is proposing to remove the requirement that sources of coal ash pollution be controlled at all.
4. The remand rule removes the requirement for polluters to respond immediately to coal ash spills.
The existing rule requires that polluters “immediately” act to control the release of coal ash pollutants into the environment in the event of a spill. Shockingly, EPA is proposing to remove that requirement altogether.
5. The remand rule eliminates the requirement to close coal ash ponds that fail safety standards.
EPA is proposing to eliminate the requirement that coal ash ponds close if they fail to achieve minimum structural stability standards established in the 2015 rule. Catastrophic failure of coal ash dams threatens lives and entire communities and ecosystems.
6. The remand rule allows coal ash dumps to continue to operate in dangerous locations.
Under the existing rule, coal ash disposal units that are located in areas where harm to health and the environment is likely must demonstrate by October 17, 2018 that they are not violating location restrictions or they must cease accepting waste and close. Even coal ash dumps that are sitting in groundwater may no longer have to close by a date certain.
7. The remand rule allows political appointees to decide if a cleanup is adequate or even required.
EPA has proposed to allow directors of state agencies—political appointees, instead of professional engineers, to make at least 40 different technical determinations that would allow a facility to deviate from the requirements of EPA’s 2015 rule. The proposal allows the potentially politically driven judgment of a state regulator to be substituted for the technical judgment of an expert or the wisdom of EPA in setting the standards.
8. The remand rule shortens the post-closure care period and letting polluters off the hook.
EPA is now proposing to reverse course and allow states, or the owners themselves when there is no state permit program, to dramatically reduce the 30-year post-closure care period. Because hazardous chemicals leaking from ash dumps often move slowly through soil and groundwater, a short post-closure care period will mean that leaks go undetected and polluters avoid cleanup of their toxic messes.
9. The remand rule removes the requirement to post compliance data, leaving citizens in the dark.
Post certain information on publicly available websites allows folks who live and work near coal ash dumps to know that their communities are safe. However, EPA is considering eliminating important internet posting requirements, which will leave residents in the dark about coal ash pollution.
Power plants have had a free pass to pollute our water and have put the health of downstream communities at risk for far too long. The 2015 coal ash rule is currently protecting hundreds of American communities. Despite some weaknesses in the current rule, coal plant owners have already established publicly accessible websites and fugitive dust control plans, completed hundreds of inspections, and published critical groundwater quality data. The commonsense standards of the 2015 rule—which received more than a half-million supporting comments from the public—are helping to protect clean water and safeguard public health. EPA’s current attempt to weaken this rule is nothing more than a total giveaway to the industry and must be rejected.
7:00 pm 05.31.2018 - 10:00 pm 06.01.2018
Orioles Game with Blue Water Baltimore
06.02.2018 12:00 pm - 4:30 pm
RiverPalooza Kickoff Paddle - Potomac Riverkeeper Network
06.13.2018 10:00 am - 3:00 pm
RiverPalooza -- Paddle & Birdwatching - Shenandoah Riverkeeper
06.21.2018 10:00 am - 4:00 pm
RiverPalooza - Paddle on Antietam - Upper Potomac Riverkeeper
06.22.2018 10:00 am - 3:00 pm
RiverPalooza -- Mallows Bay Paddle - Potomac Riverkeeper
06.22.2018 6:00 pm - 9:00 pm
River of the Year Celebration: Middle Susquehanna Riverkeeper Association
06.23.2018 7:00 am - 8:00 pm
Middle Susquehanna: Sunrise Sunset Paddle/ River of the Year Sojourn
06.23.2018 10:00 am - 1:00 pm
RiverPalooza - American Indian Paddle - Potomac Riverkeeper
- Waterkeepers (19)
- Agriculture (0)
- Conowingo Dam (5)
- Clean Water Advocacy (7)
- Polluted Runoff & Sewage Overflows (5)
- Fossil Fuels (0)
- Press Statements (15)
- Publications (1)
- Waterkeepers in the News (160)
- Fisheries & Oysters (2)
- Open Government (Transparency) (4)
- Rapid Response (0)
- Take Action (15)
- Chesapeake Bay TMDL (1)
- EPA Funding, Rollbacks & Federal Legislation (6)
- Events (7)
- Employment Opportunities (0)